Documents bilateral and multilateral defence relationships, including agreements, military assistance, exercises and training exchanges. Shows who is involved, when cooperation was recorded and what was signed, announced or reported as carried out.
Last updated
Search text, names, dates or sources.
Filters
Showing 20 of 54 records
Source update; participation start date unspecified
NATO reports partner-force participation
ReportedOfficial report
NATO’s updated country profile lists Georgia’s participation in Partner Augmentation Forces to NATO.
Details and sources
Date is the source update, not an accession date. The page distinguishes this mechanism from prior NATO Response Force declarations in 2015–2024.
US Naval Forces Europe reported Georgia among the participating countries in the Sea Breeze 25-2 mine-countermeasures exercise.
Details and sources
The record concerns a multinational maritime-security exercise. Georgia’s coastguard belongs to the Interior Ministry; participation is not evidence of a separate Georgian navy.
The State Department announced suspension of the US–Georgia Strategic Partnership mechanism.
Details and sources
The statement concerns the strategic-partnership mechanism. It must not be expanded into a claim that every military contact or programme ended; the July Noble Partner postponement remains separately dated.
The EU High Representative confirmed that European Peace Facility support for Georgia was on hold.
Details and sources
The date is the parliamentary speech confirming the hold, not necessarily its first decision date. It does not establish cancellation of all earlier approved assistance measures or delivery of the withheld package.
The United States indefinitely postponed the Noble Partner exercise planned in Georgia for 25 July–6 August 2024.
Details and sources
The announcement concerns this exercise iteration during a bilateral review. It explicitly retained other partnership intentions and does not establish the termination of all military cooperation.
The EU Council adopted a $32.43 Mn non-lethal assistance measure for Georgia’s Defence Forces.
Details and sources
Engineering, command and control, medical, logistics and cyber-defence support. This records the approved measure, not verified delivery or spending of the entire allocation.
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced Georgia’s eligibility for a risk-assessed payment schedule intended to facilitate acquisition of defence capabilities.
Details and sources
Eligibility changes the payment mechanism; it is not a weapons delivery, a grant amount or a completed purchase. The transcript places the announcement at the 9 February ministerial meeting.
The EU Council adopted a $21.06 Mn non-lethal assistance measure for Georgia’s Defence Forces.
Details and sources
Medical, logistics, engineering and cyber-defence support. This records the approved measure, not verified delivery or spending of the entire allocation.
The Madrid Summit declaration announced new political and practical support measures for Georgia and other partners.
Details and sources
Paragraph 17 identifies capacity-building, resilience and political independence. The declaration is a policy decision and does not quantify completed equipment deliveries.
US and Georgian officials signed the bilateral implementation concept for the Georgia Defense and Deterrence Enhancement Initiative.
Details and sources
The US defence release documents a framework for capability development and institutional reform. Signing the concept does not establish completion of its objectives or delivery of a specified weapons package.
The EU Council adopted a $15.07 Mn non-lethal assistance measure for Georgia’s Defence Forces.
Details and sources
Medical, engineering and civilian-type mobility equipment. This records the approved measure, not verified delivery or spending of the entire allocation.
US and Georgian defence ministers signed a memorandum establishing the Georgia Defense and Deterrence Enhancement Initiative.
Details and sources
The initiative was designed to follow the Defense Readiness Program and support institutional reform and capability development. Signature is recorded separately from the later implementation concept.
Georgia joined Lithuania, the United States and Ukraine in the Regional Cyber Defence Centre’s practical cooperation.
Details and sources
Lithuania’s 14 July account says the centre was established at the beginning of July and already identifies Georgia as a partner. It separately describes a future memorandum; no exact signing day is inferred.
Georgia’s Joint Training and Evaluation Centre and NATO’s Joint Force Training Centre completed signatures on a partnership framework.
Details and sources
NATO’s representative signed in Poland on 4 November; Georgia’s deputy chief of defence signed in Tbilisi on 11 December. The latter is the completion date used here.
NATO adopted a refreshed Substantial Package, including new military-medical, English-language and standardisation initiatives.
Details and sources
NATO’s factsheet dates adoption to December 2020. These are cooperation initiatives; adoption does not prove delivery of all equipment or completion of all associated institutional reforms.
The US and Georgian defence ministries signed a three-year Security Cooperation Framework setting bilateral priorities.
Details and sources
The State Department’s June 2020 factsheet dates the signature to November 2019 without specifying a day. A signed cooperation framework does not establish that every planned assistance activity occurred.
The NATO–Georgia Commission agreed to refresh the Substantial Package during 2020 to reflect evolving defence priorities.
Details and sources
The communiqué establishes the decision to prepare an update. The later adoption of the refreshed package in December 2020 is recorded separately and is not backdated to this meeting.
The memorandum expanded cooperation in defence capacity, military and security activity, and information sharing.
Details and sources
The State Department dates the memorandum to 6 July 2016. Its stated intentions to support acquisitions and training do not prove a specific contract or delivery.
Dated developments extend from 1991 to 2026. National ministry-budget observations cover 2004–2026; the separate SIPRI series covers 1996–2025. Additional charts retain historical personnel estimates, legal post ceilings and spending shares. Government transfer returns describe annual reports, not unique shipments or current inventories; conflicting quantities and timing remain in the source details. Procurement approvals, plans, reported production and deliveries remain distinct. This is a selected reference, not a complete inventory or readiness assessment.
Method & coverage
This is a curated public-source reference, not a complete inventory. Each record identifies an event or publication date, implementation stage and evidence type; the detail explains which date is known. An official report establishes what the issuer said; a contract does not establish delivery, and delivery does not establish readiness. Unknown quantities remain unknown. Records count publications or developments, not weapons, personnel or military strength.
Official report
The issuing institution reports the event or figure; this is not independent corroboration.
Independently corroborated
Distinct independent evidence supports the specific recorded claim.
Estimate
A sourced estimate, with its method and limits retained.
Unresolved
The available evidence does not establish the specific point.