"Hayk's Arrow" Armenian Strategic CenterA sourced record of diplomacy, agreements, borders, connectivity and humanitarian measures.
Counts cover this curated register. Each record has one primary topic and is counted once in the main chart. Multiple reports or translations of the same meeting do not create extra events. Gaps do not establish inactivity. Counts measure recorded developments, not the success of the peace process.
Official statements establish what the issuing body recorded or announced. They do not by themselves prove that every commitment was fulfilled. Event dates drive charts; later publication dates are retained separately. The register is selective and will need further additions.
Download all matching records in the current order: 26
Downloads use the selected language and include dates, status and source links.TRIPP
Parliament approved the Armenia–US framework agreement by 63 votes to 32, according to ARMENPRESS’s proceedings report.
The vote followed the 27 October debate. This records parliamentary approval; presidential promulgation, treaty notification and entry into force require separate verification.
Link to recordTRIPP
Grigoryan and infrastructure officials visited Syunik to organize the start of TRIPP infrastructure design work.
The government’s 22 October release explicitly dates the visit to 21 October. It describes design preparation and next steps, not completed construction.
Published:
Link to recordTRIPP
The Foreign Relations Committee approved the ratification bill by four votes to one, ARMENPRESS reported.
This records committee approval ahead of the plenary vote. The source is the state news agency’s proceedings report; a parliamentary vote record was not separately verified.
Link to recordTRIPP
Pashinyan chaired a review of work on the company’s draft charter and shareholders’ agreement.
The official readout identifies both documents as drafts and says discussions will continue. It does not report their adoption or company incorporation.
Link to recordTRIPP
The Constitutional Court found the TRIPP framework’s obligations constitutional in ruling DCC-1840.
The court’s index dates the ruling to 15 September and publication to 16 September; Public TV reports its outcome. This was not parliamentary ratification.
Published:
TRIPP
Pashinyan told the National Assembly that the Armenia–US TRIPP framework agreement was in the ratification stage.
This is a dated official status statement. It does not itself provide a ratification instrument, an entry-into-force notice or evidence of completed transport infrastructure.
Link to recordTRIPP
The cabinet adopted decision 1042-A concerning the law to ratify the signed Armenia–US TRIPP framework.
The dated official decree listing establishes the cabinet step. It is distinct from constitutional review, the parliamentary vote and the treaty’s entry into force.
Link to recordTRIPP
Armenia announced signature of the TRIPP strategic-cooperation framework agreement with the United States.
Rubio signed remotely in Washington on 1 June; Mirzoyan signed in Yerevan on 4 June. Domestic procedures remained necessary for entry into force. The text was published on 26 May.
Link to recordTRIPP
The DFC board approved creation of the Armenian–US TRIPP Development Company within its strategic project package.
The project summary lists no current DFC investment ($0); future subprojects require separate assessment. Approval did not establish that the Armenian joint venture was incorporated.
Link to recordTRIPP
Armenia and the United States announced an implementation framework for TRIPP following the Washington summit.
The later agreement’s preamble dates the announcement to 13 January; the Armenian MFA published it on 14 January. The framework states that it imposes no legal commitments or obligations.
Published:
Link to recordTrade
Armenia reported that petroleum products arrived from Azerbaijan by rail through Georgia.
The government links the shipment to a 28 November deputy-prime-minister agreement for 22 gasoline wagons. This documents a specific delivery, not the opening of a direct Armenia–Azerbaijan railway.
Trade
Armenia reported arrival of a train carrying approximately 1,000 tonnes of Kazakh wheat.
8 November is the government’s arrival-announcement date. The route crossed Kazakhstan, Russia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. An earlier Russian-wheat shipment is mentioned without an exact day and is not assigned a guessed date.
Link to recordTrade
Aliyev publicly stated that Azerbaijan had lifted restrictions on cargo transit to Armenia.
This record uses the announcement date, not an unverified administrative effective date. Later Armenian arrival reports separately document particular shipments via Georgia.
Link to recordTransport talks
Pashinyan said Armenia had submitted a written proposal to begin reciprocal connectivity with railway freight.
His article names Zangilan–Meghri–Ordubad and Yeraskh–Ordubad–Meghri. This dates public disclosure, not the undisclosed submission; Azerbaijan’s acceptance was not established.
Link to recordTransport talks
Pashinyan presented Armenia’s regional infrastructure proposal and four operating principles.
The proposal covers roads, railways and other links under sovereignty and jurisdiction, reciprocal access and state control. A presentation is not a bilateral implementation agreement.
Link to recordTransport talks
The working group reported a common understanding on steps for the Yeraskh–Julfa–Meghri–Horadiz railway.
The official readout dates the Moscow meeting to 2 June. Results were to be reported to the leaders; it does not provide an operating railway or a final signed transport agreement.
Link to recordTransport talks
The Moscow session discussed railway construction, services and the organization of transport.
The joint deputy-prime-minister format continued work on earlier trilateral statements. Discussion of railway construction does not establish a completed or operating line.
Link to recordTransport talks
The Moscow meeting reviewed border, customs and other controls for regional transport.
The Armenian government dates the meeting to 3 June, with publication on 4 June. Road-route options through Armenia were discussed; no opening was announced.
Published:
Link to recordTransport talks
Decision 294-A broadened the January group’s remit to preparatory work on rail and road transit construction and restoration.
The signed amendment required quarterly reports and proposals. It entered into force on 24 March; it did not approve a bilateral transit regime.
Link to recordTransport talks
Decision 40-A created a working group for restoring the Yeraskh–Azerbaijan border and Meghri railway sections.
The official decree calendar fixes the adoption date. Creation of the planning group is distinct from construction or railway reopening.
Link to recordTransport talks
The deputy prime ministers held the first part of the eighth session in Moscow.
They discussed restoration of regional transport and the January 2021 commitments. A second part was planned; the readout does not announce a reopened route.
Link to recordTransport talks
Grigoryan, Overchuk and Mustafayev resumed discussions on restoring South Caucasus transport links.
The official Armenian readout dates the meeting to 17 August. It supplies no session number or adopted route agreement.
Link to recordTransport talks
The three deputy prime ministers held a video meeting and agreed a timetable for further work.
The government explicitly calls this the second session, reviewing implementation of the November 2020 and January 2021 statements. No reopened connection was announced.
Link to recordTransport talks
Prime-ministerial decision 95-A formed Armenia’s commission and two expert subgroups for the trilateral transport process.
Signed on 4 February; effective 5 February. The act assigned coordination, reporting and diplomatic negotiation procedures, rather than authorizing an operating route.
Link to record