Documents bilateral and multilateral defence relationships, including agreements, military assistance, exercises and training exchanges. Shows who is involved, when cooperation was recorded and what was signed, announced or reported as carried out.
Last updated
Annual datasets 9U.S. FMF-funded implemented case value 2020–2024Coverage and method
Net authorised value of implemented cases and amendments financed by U.S. Foreign Military Financing (FMF). Counted in the U.S. fiscal year when the LOA, amendment or modification is implemented. This is not physical delivery, cash expenditure or Turkmenistan military expenditure. DSCA FY2024 report, published 1 July 2025: comparable retroactive FMS/FMF split for FY2020–FY2024. Explicit source zeros are retained. The −USD231 FMF observation in FY2022 is a downward case adjustment; do not round it away or label it a negative delivery. Earlier reports included BPC/FAA programmes and must not be spliced into this definition. FY2025–26 are not inferred.
Implemented FMF case values · US fiscal years. The −$231 in 2022 is a net downward adjustment, not a delivery or national expenditure. Later years are unavailable.
Original FMF row: USD 1,358,921; U.S. FY2020 (2019-10-01–2020-09-30).
U.S. FMS implemented case value 2020–2024Coverage and method
Net authorised value of implemented cases and amendments financed by partner funds (FMS). Counted in the U.S. fiscal year when the LOA, amendment or modification is implemented. This is not physical delivery, cash expenditure or Turkmenistan military expenditure. DSCA FY2024 report, published 1 July 2025: comparable retroactive FMS/FMF split for FY2020–FY2024. Explicit source zeros are retained. The −USD231 FMF observation in FY2022 is a downward case adjustment; do not round it away or label it a negative delivery. Earlier reports included BPC/FAA programmes and must not be spliced into this definition. FY2025–26 are not inferred.
Partner-funded implemented FMS cases · US fiscal years. Dots are explicit published zeros. Separate from FMF financing, physical deliveries and national budgets.
Original FMS row: USD 0; U.S. FY2020 (2019-10-01–2020-09-30).
U.S. IMET training allocation 2010–2017Coverage and method
Dollar allocation for training foreign military students and associated aids/materials, without reimbursement to the United States. The table also includes military-assistance service-funded training and emergency drawdowns. DSCA counts this programme fully delivered when funded; that accounting convention does not verify every course’s completion. DSCA Historical Facts Book, data as of 30 September 2017. U.S. fiscal years; original monetary table unit is USD thousands, divided by 1,000 for USD millions. Source dashes remain omitted; they are not converted into zero. Historical report definitions and vintage are retained separately from the FY2024 FMS/FMF split. Do not add financing, agreements and deliveries together.
USD · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Financing, agreements, deliveries and training allocations are distinct measures. Source dashes remain missing; later report definitions are not spliced in.
U.S. FY2010: 2009-10-01–2010-09-30. Original table: 262 USD thousand.
U.S. IMET table · students trained 2010–2016Coverage and method
Annual students trained in the DSCA IMET table, including military-assistance service-funded and emergency-drawdown training. Programme counts are not force strength and do not identify unique individuals across years. DSCA data as of 30 September 2017, U.S. fiscal years. These are annual training-table student counts, not unique people across all years or the size of the Turkmen armed forces. Source dashes are omitted; no zero is inferred. Do not merge different training programmes.
Programme-table students · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Counts are not force strength or unique people across years. Source dashes remain missing.
U.S. FY2010: 2009-10-01–2010-09-30. Original table: 5 students.
U.S. counterterrorism training allocation 2010–2017Coverage and method
Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP) allocation for foreign military training and related materials without reimbursement to the United States. DSCA considers the programme delivered when funded. This is a specific training programme, not all U.S. assistance or Turkmen military spending. DSCA Historical Facts Book, data as of 30 September 2017. U.S. fiscal years; original monetary table unit is USD thousands, divided by 1,000 for USD millions. Source dashes remain omitted; they are not converted into zero. Historical report definitions and vintage are retained separately from the FY2024 FMS/FMF split. Do not add financing, agreements and deliveries together.
USD · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Financing, agreements, deliveries and training allocations are distinct measures. Source dashes remain missing; later report definitions are not spliced in.
U.S. FY2010: 2009-10-01–2010-09-30. Original table: 15 USD thousand.
U.S. counterterrorism programme · trainees 2010–2017Coverage and method
Annual students trained under the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP), reported separately from IMET. Funding-year amounts and student counts can differ; no cost-per-student ratio is calculated. DSCA data as of 30 September 2017, U.S. fiscal years. These are annual training-table student counts, not unique people across all years or the size of the Turkmen armed forces. Source dashes are omitted; no zero is inferred. Do not merge different training programmes.
Programme-table students · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Counts are not force strength or unique people across years. Source dashes remain missing.
U.S. FY2010: 2009-10-01–2010-09-30. Original table: 2 students.
U.S. FMF grants extended · 2017 report 2010–2016Coverage and method
FMF credit/grant extended in the fiscal year for defence procurement; Turkmenistan’s entries are entirely payment-waived grants. These financing amounts may fund contracts in earlier, current or later years. They are not implemented-case values, delivery costs or Turkmen budget expenditure. DSCA Historical Facts Book, data as of 30 September 2017. U.S. fiscal years; original monetary table unit is USD thousands, divided by 1,000 for USD millions. Source dashes remain omitted; they are not converted into zero. Historical report definitions and vintage are retained separately from the FY2024 FMS/FMF split. Do not add financing, agreements and deliveries together.
USD · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Financing, agreements, deliveries and training allocations are distinct measures. Source dashes remain missing; later report definitions are not spliced in.
U.S. FY2010: 2009-10-01–2010-09-30. Original table: 2,000 USD thousand.
U.S. FMS agreements · 2017 report 2016–2017Coverage and method
Defence articles and services purchased through FMS with cash, credit or MAP merger funds. This is the 2017 report’s agreement measure, including its historical revisions; it is not the FY2024 partner-financed-only FMS measure or physical delivery. DSCA Historical Facts Book, data as of 30 September 2017. U.S. fiscal years; original monetary table unit is USD thousands, divided by 1,000 for USD millions. Source dashes remain omitted; they are not converted into zero. Historical report definitions and vintage are retained separately from the FY2024 FMS/FMF split. Do not add financing, agreements and deliveries together.
USD · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Financing, agreements, deliveries and training allocations are distinct measures. Source dashes remain missing; later report definitions are not spliced in.
U.S. FY2016: 2015-10-01–2016-09-30. Original table: 60 USD thousand.
U.S. FMS deliveries · 2017 report 2010–2016Coverage and method
DSCA’s historical value of defence articles and services delivered under FMS. The definition includes accrued expenditure and reporting after shipment or service performance. This is a dated U.S. supplier-side programme account, not Turkmenistan’s annual military expenditure. DSCA Historical Facts Book, data as of 30 September 2017. U.S. fiscal years; original monetary table unit is USD thousands, divided by 1,000 for USD millions. Source dashes remain omitted; they are not converted into zero. Historical report definitions and vintage are retained separately from the FY2024 FMS/FMF split. Do not add financing, agreements and deliveries together.
USD · US fiscal years · 2017 report vintage. Financing, agreements, deliveries and training allocations are distinct measures. Source dashes remain missing; later report definitions are not spliced in.
Twenty Defence Ministry officers joined OSCE training on military information exchange and verification under the Vienna Document.
Details and sources
The seminar ran on 2–5 September with expertise from Kazakhstan. Participation in training is recorded; it is not itself evidence of a completed international inspection or full compliance assessment.
Turkmen defence and security agencies joined an OSCE roundtable on regional cooperation, arms control and confidence-building measures.
Details and sources
Participants included the Defence Ministry, other security agencies and OSCE representatives. The record concerns a completed policy discussion, not a new treaty or independently verified arms-control implementation.
President Berdimuhamedov received Turkish Defence Minister Yaşar Güler; talks also took place with Turkmen defence officials.
Details and sources
The Foreign Ministry report dated 27 June describes the meetings of 26 June. Training and modern technologies were discussed. The report does not disclose a signed procurement contract, equipment quantity or price.
Belgium’s OSCE submission records a Belgian guest inspector joining a US team to Turkmenistan during 15–21 October 2023.
Details and sources
The plotted date is the end of the reported visit window, not an independently established single inspection day. The submission does not publish findings or certify overall force readiness.
Belgium’s OSCE submission records a Vienna Document inspection in Turkmenistan during 2–6 October 2023, with two Belgian participants.
Details and sources
The table explicitly describes inspections conducted during 2023. The plotted date is the end of its reporting window. Inspection findings and a general readiness assessment are not published.
The two defence ministries signed a defence-cooperation agreement during the Kazakh president’s state visit.
Details and sources
Kazakhstan’s presidency lists the agreement among signed documents. The announcement does not identify a procurement contract, equipment delivery or mutual-defence guarantee.
The Mejlis ratified the Caspian Sea legal-status convention signed in Aktau on 12 August 2018.
Details and sources
Kazakhstan’s presidency describes non-presence of armed forces from outside the five parties among its principles. This record dates Turkmen ratification; it does not establish convention-wide entry into force.
Nineteen Defence Ministry officials completed an OSCE roundtable on secure storage of small arms and ammunition.
Details and sources
Experts from four partner states shared experience. The same release separately describes a course for 25 defence specialists; the two counts are not combined into unique trainees.
Four representatives of the presidential administration and Defence Ministry completed an OSCE-supported UK study visit.
Details and sources
The five-day visit covered storage and destruction facilities, registration, rotation and incident response. It was organized with the UK Ministry of Defence’s Joint Arms Control Implementation Group and British embassy.
Six Turkmen Defence Ministry arms-control officers completed a two-week Vienna Document course organized with Germany and the OSCE.
Details and sources
Training included the German verification centre and a simulated inspection in Switzerland. Six is the course cohort, not a national inspectorate total.
The Turkmen president and NATO secretary general agreed to enhance practical cooperation under Partnership for Peace.
Details and sources
Their headquarters meeting also addressed Central Asian security and ISAF in Afghanistan. The notice reports dialogue and political support, without a new basing agreement or Turkmen troop commitment.
The UN General Assembly adopted resolution 50/80 A recognizing and supporting Turkmenistan’s declared permanent neutrality.
Details and sources
The UN voting record says adopted without a vote on 12 December 1995. The resolution calls on members to respect the status and territorial integrity; it is not a military alliance commitment.
Deputy Prime Minister Boris Shikmuradov signed NATO’s Partnership for Peace Framework Document at NATO headquarters.
Details and sources
NATO’s contemporaneous notice and signature table agree on 10 May 1994. Participation is a cooperation framework, without NATO membership or a collective-defence guarantee.
The Mejlis ratified a treaty with Russia on joint border protection and Russian border troops’ status.
Details and sources
Resolution No.928-XII identifies signature in Ashgabat on 23 December 1993. This records Turkmen ratification, not the effective date or the duration of subsequent Russian deployment.
Turkmen ratification; treaty signature: 31 July 1992
Joint force-creation treaty ratified
AdoptedOfficial report
The Mejlis ratified the Russia–Turkmenistan joint-measures treaty signed on 31 July 1992.
Details and sources
The text provided for forces based on former Soviet units, transitional joint command and agreed training. Ratification is separate from signature; entry into force depended on exchanging instruments, whose date is not established here.
Source review through 1 November 2026. Personnel estimates cover 1992–2020; SIPRI’s adopted-budget figures stop in 1999 and change scope with public-account classifications. No current defence-only budget is inferred from whole-state totals. US fiscal-year programmes, supplier export authorisations, declared transfers and public displays remain separate measures. Local shipyard work does not establish wholly domestic production.
Method & coverage
This is a curated public-source reference, not a complete inventory. Each record identifies an event or publication date, implementation stage and evidence type; the detail explains which date is known. An official report establishes what the issuer said; a contract does not establish delivery, and delivery does not establish readiness. Unknown quantities remain unknown. Records count publications or developments, not weapons, personnel or military strength.
Official report
The issuing institution reports the event or figure; this is not independent corroboration.
Independently corroborated
Distinct independent evidence supports the specific recorded claim.
Estimate
A sourced estimate, with its method and limits retained.
Unresolved
The available evidence does not establish the specific point.